| Title |
Acupuncture for (sub)acute non‐specific low‐back pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009265 |
| Authors |
Andrea D Furlan, Fatemeh Yazdi, Alexander Tsertsvadze, Lixing Lao, Karen Sherman, Carlo Ammendolia, Ellen Wang, Byung‐Cheul Shin, Ikuro Wakayama, Maurits W van Tulder |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 147 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 12% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 18% |
| Unknown | 34 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 11% |
| Psychology | 9 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 39 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#8,296,578
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,927
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,505
of 131,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#73
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.