| Title |
Interventions for treating pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome‐ an overview of systematic reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009416.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael C Ferraro, Aidan G Cashin, Benedict M Wand, Keith M Smart, Carolyn Berryman, Louise Marston, G Lorimer Moseley, James H McAuley, Neil E O'Connell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 15% |
| Australia | 11 | 14% |
| Ireland | 4 | 5% |
| France | 4 | 5% |
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 63% |
| Scientists | 16 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 181 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 12% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Researcher | 14 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 22% |
| Unknown | 49 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 59 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2024.
All research outputs
#840,410
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,602
of 13,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,007
of 385,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.