Title |
Male involvement for increasing the effectiveness of prevention of mother‐to‐child HIV transmission (PMTCT) programmes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009468.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Serena Brusamento, Elena Ghanotakis, Lorainne Tudor Car, Michelle HMMT van‐Velthoven, Azeem Majeed, Josip Car |
Abstract |
Despite efforts to increase the uptake of prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) services, coverage is still lower than desired in developing countries. A lack of male partner involvement in PMTCT services is a major barrier for women to access these services. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 1 | 25% |
Canada | 1 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 394 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Tanzania, United Republic of | 2 | <1% |
Kenya | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 388 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 71 | 18% |
Researcher | 68 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 5% |
Other | 67 | 17% |
Unknown | 100 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 115 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 40 | 10% |
Psychology | 16 | 4% |
Unspecified | 13 | 3% |
Other | 53 | 13% |
Unknown | 106 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2012.
All research outputs
#14,841,711
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,909
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,092
of 193,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#182
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.