↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Endometrial injury in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
18 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
205 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
Title
Endometrial injury in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009517.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolina O Nastri, Sarah F Lensen, Ahmed Gibreel, Nick Raine‐Fenning, Rui A Ferriani, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Wellington P Martins

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 212 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 13%
Researcher 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Other 16 8%
Other 45 21%
Unknown 47 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 59 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,172,130
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,424
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,677
of 277,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#59
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.