↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

PET‐CT for assessing mediastinal lymph node involvement in patients with suspected resectable non‐small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
202 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
371 Mendeley
Title
PET‐CT for assessing mediastinal lymph node involvement in patients with suspected resectable non‐small cell lung cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009519.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mia Schmidt‐Hansen, David R Baldwin, Elise Hasler, Javier Zamora, Víctor Abraira, Marta Roqué i Figuls

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 369 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 18%
Researcher 42 11%
Student > Bachelor 31 8%
Other 28 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 8%
Other 75 20%
Unknown 99 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 160 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 2%
Other 44 12%
Unknown 120 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,169,970
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,530
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,410
of 270,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.