| Title |
Home‐ or community‐based programmes for treating malaria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009527.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charles I Okwundu, Sukrti Nagpal, Alfred Musekiwa, David Sinclair |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 30% |
| South Africa | 2 | 20% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 10% |
| India | 1 | 10% |
| Senegal | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 409 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Burkina Faso | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 393 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 70 | 17% |
| Researcher | 63 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 10% |
| Other | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 77 | 19% |
| Unknown | 83 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 130 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 55 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 44 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 5% |
| Psychology | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 46 | 11% |
| Unknown | 103 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,031,250
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,765
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,081
of 207,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#126
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.