↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Polymerase chain reaction blood tests for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised people

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Polymerase chain reaction blood tests for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised people
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009551.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mario Cruciani, Carlo Mengoli, Rosemary Barnes, J Peter Donnelly, Juergen Loeffler, Brian L Jones, Lena Klingspor, Johan Maertens, Charles O Morton, Lewis P White

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 124 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 14%
Researcher 15 12%
Other 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Other 27 22%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 34 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,255,559
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,969
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,288
of 350,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#80
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.