↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotic therapy versus no antibiotic therapy for children aged two to 59 months with WHO‐defined non‐severe pneumonia and wheeze

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Antibiotic therapy versus no antibiotic therapy for children aged two to 59 months with WHO‐defined non‐severe pneumonia and wheeze
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009576.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zohra S Lassi, Rohail Kumar, Jai K Das, Rehana A Salam, Zulfiqar A Bhutta

Abstract

Worldwide, pneumonia is the leading cause of death among children under five years of age and accounts for approximately two million deaths annually. The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed case management guidelines based on simple clinical signs to help clinicians decide on the appropriate pneumonia treatment. Children and infants who exhibit fast breathing (50 breaths per minute or more in infants two months to 12 months of age and 40 or more in children 12 months to five years of age) and cough are presumed to have non-severe pneumonia and the WHO recommends antibiotics. Implementation of these guidelines to identify and manage pneumonia at the community level has been shown to reduce acute respiratory infection (ARI)-related mortality by 36%, although apprehension exists regarding these results due to the questionable quality of evidence. As WHO guidelines do not make a distinction between viral and bacterial pneumonia, these children continue to receive antibiotics because of the concern that it may not be safe to do otherwise. Therefore, it is essential to explore the role of antibiotics in children with WHO-defined non-severe pneumonia and wheeze and to develop effective guidelines for initial antibiotic treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 137 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 16%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Other 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 28 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 35 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,535,526
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,060
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,558
of 240,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#103
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.