| Title |
Imaging modalities for the non‐invasive diagnosis of endometriosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009591.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vicki Nisenblat, Patrick MM Bossuyt, Cindy Farquhar, Neil Johnson, M Louise Hull |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Finland | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 749 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 745 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 99 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 91 | 12% |
| Other | 62 | 8% |
| Researcher | 62 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 6% |
| Other | 166 | 22% |
| Unknown | 222 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 292 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 3% |
| Psychology | 22 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 22 | 3% |
| Other | 97 | 13% |
| Unknown | 247 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#814,291
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,539
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,833
of 313,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.