| Title |
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009632.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Glechner, Gernot Wagner, Jerzy W Mitus, Birgit Teufer, Irma Klerings, Nina Böck, Ludwig Grillich, Dominik Berzaczy, Thomas H Helbich, Gerald Gartlehner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Argentina | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Scientists | 3 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 64 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 24 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 29% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,894,509
of 25,643,886 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,054
of 13,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,203
of 423,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,643,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.