| Title |
Early routine endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography strategy versus early conservative management strategy in acute gallstone pancreatitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009779.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frances Tse, Yuhong Yuan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 50% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 308 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 35 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 10% |
| Researcher | 29 | 9% |
| Other | 25 | 8% |
| Other | 72 | 23% |
| Unknown | 81 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 157 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 20 | 6% |
| Unknown | 102 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,774,711
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,412
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,075
of 179,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.