| Title |
Slow‐release oral morphine as maintenance therapy for opioid dependence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009879.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marica Ferri, Silvia Minozzi, Alessandra Bo, Laura Amato |
| Abstract |
Opioid substitution treatments are effective in retaining people in treatment and suppressing heroin use. An open question remains whether slow-release oral morphine (SROM) could represent a possible alternative for opioid-dependent people who respond poorly to other available maintenance treatments. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 248 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 38 | 15% |
| Researcher | 30 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 16% |
| Unknown | 66 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 35% |
| Psychology | 21 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 37 | 15% |
| Unknown | 76 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,145,577
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,417
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,087
of 210,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#151
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.