| Title |
Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for the preoperative locoregional staging of primary gastric cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009944.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simone Mocellin, Sandro Pasquali |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 22% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| Peru | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 273 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 10% |
| Other | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 52 | 19% |
| Unknown | 89 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 114 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 4% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Unknown | 100 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2015.
All research outputs
#3,232,169
of 24,616,908 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,008
of 12,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,685
of 362,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#126
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,616,908 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.