↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Immunomodulatory interventions for focal epilepsy syndromes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
Title
Immunomodulatory interventions for focal epilepsy syndromes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009945.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren Walker, Munir Pirmohamed, Anthony G Marson

Abstract

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder made particularly disabling in the 30% of patients who do not achieve freedom from seizures despite multiple trials of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Experimental and clinical evidence supports a role for inflammatory pathway activation in the pathogenesis of epilepsy which, if effectively targeted by immunomodulatory interventions, highlights a potentially novel therapeutic strategy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 142 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 18%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Student > Postgraduate 13 9%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 42 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 12%
Psychology 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 50 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,065,946
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,341
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,026
of 209,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#208
of 297 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 297 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.