| Title |
Botulinum toxin for upper oesophageal sphincter dysfunction in neurological swallowing disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009968.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie Regan, Anne Murphy, Mindy Chiang, Barry P McMahon, Tara Coughlan, Margaret Walshe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 287 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 61 | 21% |
| Unknown | 105 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 10% |
| Psychology | 17 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 11% |
| Unknown | 112 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2014.
All research outputs
#16,106,935
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,216
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,233
of 242,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#194
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.