Title |
Reducing medication errors for adults in hospital settings
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2021
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009985.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Agustín Ciapponi, Simon E Fernandez Nievas, Mariana Seijo, María Belén Rodríguez, Valeria Vietto, Herney A García-Perdomo, Sacha Virgilio, Ana V Fajreldines, Josep Tost, Christopher J Rose, Ezequiel Garcia-Elorrio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 23 | 21% |
United Kingdom | 8 | 7% |
Ecuador | 6 | 5% |
Colombia | 5 | 5% |
Japan | 4 | 4% |
France | 3 | 3% |
Chile | 3 | 3% |
United States | 3 | 3% |
Australia | 3 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Unknown | 44 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 82 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 19% |
Scientists | 5 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 246 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 5% |
Researcher | 12 | 5% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 5% |
Other | 31 | 13% |
Unknown | 143 | 58% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 11% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 8% |
Chemistry | 3 | 1% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
Other | 17 | 7% |
Unknown | 148 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2023.
All research outputs
#482,077
of 25,539,438 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#849
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,056
of 515,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,539,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.