Title |
Integration of HIV/AIDS services with maternal, neonatal and child health, nutrition, and family planning services
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010119 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mary Lou Lindegren, Caitlin E Kennedy, Deborah Bain‐Brickley, Hana Azman, Andreea A Creanga, Lisa M Butler, Alicen B Spaulding, Tara Horvath, Gail E Kennedy |
Abstract |
The integration of HIV/AIDS and maternal, neonatal, child health and nutrition services (MNCHN), including family planning (FP) is recognized as a key strategy to reduce maternal and child mortality and control the HIV/AIDS epidemic. However, limited evidence exists on the effectiveness of service integration. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sri Lanka | 1 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 472 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Peru | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 462 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 83 | 18% |
Researcher | 70 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 42 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 6% |
Other | 74 | 16% |
Unknown | 129 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 129 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 66 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 47 | 10% |
Psychology | 20 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 2% |
Other | 49 | 10% |
Unknown | 151 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2012.
All research outputs
#15,226,798
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,001
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,415
of 187,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#179
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.