↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Aminoadamantanes for chronic hepatitis C

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Aminoadamantanes for chronic hepatitis C
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010125.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mieke H Lamers, Mark Broekman, Joost PH Drenth, Christian Gluud

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 169 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 20%
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 54 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 34%
Psychology 12 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 61 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2014.
All research outputs
#14,445,576
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,805
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,260
of 242,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#180
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.