| Title |
Glucose targets for preventing diabetic kidney disease and its progression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010137.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marinella Ruospo, Valeria M Saglimbene, Suetonia C Palmer, Salvatore De Cosmo, Antonio Pacilli, Olga Lamacchia, Mauro Cignarelli, Paola Fioretto, Mariacristina Vecchio, Jonathan C Craig, Giovanni FM Strippoli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 116 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 37 | 32% |
| Chile | 23 | 20% |
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| El Salvador | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 38 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 102 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 9% |
| Scientists | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 400 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 400 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 55 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 12% |
| Researcher | 42 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 82 | 21% |
| Unknown | 121 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 153 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 37 | 9% |
| Unknown | 131 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2020.
All research outputs
#579,208
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,028
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,019
of 332,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.