↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fetal assessment methods for improving neonatal and maternal outcomes in preterm prelabour rupture of membranes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
Title
Fetal assessment methods for improving neonatal and maternal outcomes in preterm prelabour rupture of membranes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010209.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gemma C Sharp, Sarah J Stock, Jane E Norman

Abstract

Fetal assessment following preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM) may result in earlier delivery due to earlier detection of fetal compromise. However, early delivery may not always be in the fetal or maternal interest, and the effectiveness of different fetal assessment methods in improving neonatal and maternal outcomes is uncertain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 185 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Master 18 10%
Other 15 8%
Other 39 21%
Unknown 55 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 11%
Psychology 6 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 63 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,133,628
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,447
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,323
of 266,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#78
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.