↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interconception care for women with a history of gestational diabetes for improving maternal and infant outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Interconception care for women with a history of gestational diabetes for improving maternal and infant outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010211.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tieu J, Bain E, Middleton P, Crowther CA, Tieu, Joanna, Bain, Emily, Middleton, Philippa, Crowther, Caroline A

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with adverse health outcomes for both mother and infant both perinatally and long-term. Women with a history of GDM are at risk of recurrence in subsequent pregnancies and may benefit from intervention in the interconception period to improve maternal and infant health outcomes. To investigate the effects of interconception care for women with a history of GDM on maternal and infant health outcomes. We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 January 2013). Randomised controlled trials, including quasi-randomised controlled trials and cluster-randomised trials evaluating any protocol of interconception care with standard care or other forms of interconception care for women with a history of GDM in a previous pregnancy on maternal and infant health outcomes. Two review authors independently assessed study eligibility. In future updates of this review, at least two review authors will extract data and assess the risk of bias of included studies. One ongoing trial was identified. No eligible completed trials were identified. The role of interconception care for women with a history of gestational diabetes remains unclear. Randomised controlled trials are required evaluating different forms and protocols of interconception care for these women on perinatal and long-term maternal and infant health outcomes, acceptability of such interventions and cost-effectiveness.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 83 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 22%
Researcher 16 18%
Other 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 15 17%