| Title |
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010216.pub7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jamie Hartmann-Boyce<sup>a</sup>, Nicola Lindson<sup>a</sup>, Ailsa R Butler, Hayden McRobbie, Chris Bullen, Rachna Begh, Annika Theodoulou, Caitlin Notley, Nancy A Rigotti, Tari Turner, Thomas R Fanshawe, Peter Hajek |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 753 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 108 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 84 | 11% |
| Mexico | 41 | 5% |
| Australia | 33 | 4% |
| France | 20 | 3% |
| Canada | 17 | 2% |
| Germany | 17 | 2% |
| Spain | 17 | 2% |
| Argentina | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 99 | 13% |
| Unknown | 308 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 640 | 85% |
| Scientists | 46 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 44 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 16 | 2% |
| Unknown | 7 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 191 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
| Researcher | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 110 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Psychology | 8 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 110 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1535. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,642
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224
of 494,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 494,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.