| Title |
Techniques to ascertain correct endotracheal tube placement in neonates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010221.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Georg M Schmölzer, Charles Christoph C Roehr |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 43% |
| Colombia | 1 | 14% |
| Peru | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 1% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,150,951
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,462
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,080
of 341,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#138
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.