Title |
Antibody induction versus corticosteroid induction for liver transplant recipients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010252.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Luit Penninga, André Wettergren, Colin H Wilson, An‐Wen Chan, Daniel A Steinbrüchel, Christian Gluud |
Abstract |
Liver transplantation is an established treatment option for end-stage liver failure. To date, no consensus has been reached on the use of immunosuppressive T-cell specific antibody induction compared with corticosteroid induction of immunosuppression after liver transplantation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 206 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 39 | 19% |
Researcher | 23 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
Other | 13 | 6% |
Other | 40 | 19% |
Unknown | 57 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 41% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 5% |
Psychology | 5 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Other | 22 | 11% |
Unknown | 65 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,723,600
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,914
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,094
of 241,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#216
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.