↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibody induction versus placebo, no induction, or another type of antibody induction for liver transplant recipients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
Title
Antibody induction versus placebo, no induction, or another type of antibody induction for liver transplant recipients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010253.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luit Penninga, André Wettergren, Colin H Wilson, An‐Wen Chan, Daniel A Steinbrüchel, Christian Gluud

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 188 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 15%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Other 15 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Other 35 19%
Unknown 54 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Psychology 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 62 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2015.
All research outputs
#22,830,803
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,281
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,765
of 242,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#221
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.