| Title |
Mirror therapy, graded motor imagery and virtual illusion for the management of chronic pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010329.pub2 |
| Authors |
Lee Plumbe, Susan Peters, Sally Bennett, Bill Vicenzino, Michel W Coppieters |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 65 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 21% |
| Unknown | 13 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 11% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,195
of 315,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#219
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.