| Title |
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for critically ill adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010381.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aidan Burrell, Jiwon Kim, Patricia Alliegro, Lorena Romero, Ary Serpa Neto, Frederick Mariajoseph, Carol Hodgson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 13% |
| Germany | 2 | 8% |
| Japan | 2 | 8% |
| Australia | 2 | 8% |
| Mexico | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 63% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 160 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Researcher | 2 | 1% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 1% |
| Professor | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 147 | 92% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Psychology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 147 | 92% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,946,741
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,163
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,671
of 357,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.