↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non‐pharmaceutical management of respiratory morbidity in children with severe global developmental delay

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
433 Mendeley
Title
Non‐pharmaceutical management of respiratory morbidity in children with severe global developmental delay
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010382.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naomi R Winfield, Nicki J Barker, Esme R Turner, Gemma L Quin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 433 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 431 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 16%
Student > Bachelor 48 11%
Researcher 42 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 8%
Other 23 5%
Other 79 18%
Unknown 137 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 81 19%
Psychology 16 4%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Sports and Recreations 8 2%
Other 45 10%
Unknown 166 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2016.
All research outputs
#4,882,087
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,281
of 13,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,542
of 272,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#144
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.