↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Parent‐infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
19 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
792 Mendeley
Title
Parent‐infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010534.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Barlow, Cathy Bennett, Nick Midgley, Soili K Larkin, Yinghui Wei

Abstract

Parent-infant psychotherapy (PIP) is a dyadic intervention that works with parent and infant together, with the aim of improving the parent-infant relationship and promoting infant attachment and optimal infant development. PIP aims to achieve this by targeting the mother's view of her infant, which may be affected by her own experiences, and linking them to her current relationship to her child, in order to improve the parent-infant relationship directly.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 792 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 789 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 135 17%
Researcher 94 12%
Student > Bachelor 80 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 51 6%
Other 133 17%
Unknown 224 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 187 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 147 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 82 10%
Social Sciences 55 7%
Neuroscience 12 2%
Other 66 8%
Unknown 243 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,329,138
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,823
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,474
of 359,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.