↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Corneal collagen cross‐linking for treating keratoconus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
Title
Corneal collagen cross‐linking for treating keratoconus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010621.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evripidis Sykakis, Rushmia Karim, Jennifer R Evans, Catey Bunce, Kwesi N Amissah‐Arthur, Showrob Patwary, Peter J McDonnell, Samer Hamada

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 244 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 14%
Student > Master 33 13%
Researcher 26 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 8%
Student > Postgraduate 18 7%
Other 43 18%
Unknown 71 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 11%
Psychology 9 4%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 82 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,284,742
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,697
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,838
of 278,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.