| Title |
Physical exercise for the treatment of non‐ulcerated chronic venous insufficiency
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010637.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diego N Araujo, Cibele Td Ribeiro, Alvaro Cc Maciel, Selma S Bruno, Guilherme Af Fregonezi, Fernando Al Dias |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 19 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 19 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#23,180,363
of 25,809,966 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,830
of 13,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,690
of 383,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#128
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,966 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.