| Title |
Iron therapy in anaemic adults without chronic kidney disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010640.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Myura Nagendran, Jack F Broadhurst, Stefan D Anker, Toby Richards |
| Abstract |
Anaemia affects about a quarter of the world's population. An estimated 50% of anaemic people have anaemia due to iron deficiency. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 315 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 56 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 11% |
| Researcher | 30 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 48 | 15% |
| Unknown | 101 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 121 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 9% |
| Psychology | 14 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 9% |
| Unknown | 112 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2015.
All research outputs
#4,381,989
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,859
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,399
of 361,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#141
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.