| Title |
Iodine fortification of foods and condiments, other than salt, for preventing iodine deficiency disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010734.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph Alvin R Santos, Anthea Christoforou, Kathy Trieu, Briar L McKenzie, Shauna Downs, Laurent Billot, Jacqui Webster, Mu Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 20% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 7% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| South Africa | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 33% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 459 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 459 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 61 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 57 | 12% |
| Researcher | 53 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 72 | 16% |
| Unknown | 155 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 87 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 72 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 4% |
| Psychology | 17 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 70 | 15% |
| Unknown | 183 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,573,641
of 25,505,015 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,383
of 13,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,715
of 458,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,505,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.