| Title |
Time‐limited home‐care reablement services for maintaining and improving the functional independence of older adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010825.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andy Cochrane, Mairead Furlong, Sinead McGilloway, David W Molloy, Michael Stevenson, Michael Donnelly |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 25% |
| Ireland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 400 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 399 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 9% |
| Researcher | 32 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 75 | 19% |
| Unknown | 145 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 75 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 27 | 7% |
| Psychology | 24 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 42 | 11% |
| Unknown | 167 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2019.
All research outputs
#5,410,691
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,621
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,160
of 331,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#164
of 280 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 280 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.