| Title |
Dihydroartemisinin‐piperaquine for treating uncomplicated <i>Plasmodium falciparum</i> malaria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010927 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Babalwa Zani, Michael Gathu, Sarah Donegan, Piero L Olliaro, David Sinclair |
| Abstract |
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends Artemisinin-based Combination Therapy (ACT) for treating uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. This review aims to assist the decision-making of malaria control programmes by providing an overview of the relative effects of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-P) versus other recommended ACTs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 36% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Ghana | 1 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 398 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 395 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 63 | 16% |
| Researcher | 51 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 10% |
| Other | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 73 | 18% |
| Unknown | 108 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 140 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 53 | 13% |
| Unknown | 121 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#975,953
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,938
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,544
of 322,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.