| Title |
Oral direct thrombin inhibitors or oral factor Xa inhibitors versus conventional anticoagulants for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010956.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaoqin Wang<sup>a</sup>, Yanfang Ma<sup>a</sup>, Xu Hui, Meixuan Li, Jing Li, Jinhui Tian, Qi Wang, Peijing Yan, Jianfeng Li, Ping Xie, Kehu Yang, Liang Yao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 17% |
| France | 2 | 9% |
| Greece | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 21 | 32% |
| Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 21 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,136,149
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,853
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,450
of 419,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.