| Title |
Topical clonidine for neuropathic pain in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010967.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wojciech T Serednicki, Anna Wrzosek, Jaroslaw Woron, Jaroslaw Garlicki, Jan Dobrogowski, Joanna Jakowicka-Wordliczek, Jerzy Wordliczek, Renata Zajaczkowska |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong | 2 | 15% |
| Spain | 2 | 15% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 8% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 5% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 53 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 55 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,869,991
of 25,623,883 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,011
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,867
of 445,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#59
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,623,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.