| Title |
Imaging for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011053.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thijs E van Mens, Luuk Jj Scheres, Paulien G de Jong, Mariska Mg Leeflang, Mathilde Nijkeuter, Saskia Middeldorp |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 30% |
| France | 2 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 175 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 13% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Researcher | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 57 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 63 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,106,720
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,422
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,203
of 428,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#111
of 288 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 288 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.