| Title |
Interventions to improve disposal of child faeces for preventing diarrhoea and soil‐transmitted helminth infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011055.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiona Majorin, Belen Torondel, Gabrielle Ka Seen Chan, Thomas Clasen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| South Africa | 1 | 14% |
| Belgium | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 408 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 408 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 12% |
| Researcher | 37 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 63 | 15% |
| Unknown | 165 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 67 | 16% |
| Unknown | 183 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,300,012
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,588
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,678
of 357,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#117
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.