| Title |
Mobile phone‐based interventions for improving contraception use
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011159.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tanaraj Perinpanathan, Shilpa Maiya, Michelle Helena Hmmt van Velthoven, Amy T Nguyen, Caroline Free, Chris Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| India | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 29 | 32% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 30 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 31 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,795,217
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,452
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,184
of 354,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.