↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non‐medical prescribing versus medical prescribing for acute and chronic disease management in primary and secondary care

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
481 X users
facebook
12 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
196 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
996 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Non‐medical prescribing versus medical prescribing for acute and chronic disease management in primary and secondary care
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011227.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Greg Weeks, Johnson George, Katie Maclure, Derek Stewart

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 481 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 996 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 993 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 177 18%
Student > Bachelor 101 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 100 10%
Researcher 97 10%
Student > Postgraduate 60 6%
Other 181 18%
Unknown 280 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 226 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 205 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 66 7%
Social Sciences 42 4%
Psychology 35 4%
Other 105 11%
Unknown 317 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 405. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2024.
All research outputs
#73,980
of 25,552,933 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#141
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,644
of 416,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.