| Title |
Drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty versus uncoated balloon angioplasty for peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011319.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ahmed Kayssi, Talal Al‐Atassi, George Oreopoulos, Graham Roche‐Nagle, Kong Teng Tan, Dheeraj K Rajan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| Canada | 3 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Argentina | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 40% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 287 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 53 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 11% |
| Researcher | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 49 | 17% |
| Unknown | 87 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 115 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 11% |
| Psychology | 9 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Unknown | 97 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,918,386
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,095
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,982
of 385,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#89
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.