↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Autolytic debridement for pressure ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Autolytic debridement for pressure ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011331.pub2
Authors

Jimmy Choo, Jane Nixon, Andrea Nelson, Elizabeth McGinnis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 9 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Unknown 9 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2022.
All research outputs
#17,350,971
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,095
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,026
of 367,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#134
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.