| Title |
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011335.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew A Kirkman, Julia Day, Karin Gehring, Karolis Zienius, David Grosshans, Martin Taphoorn, Jing Li, Paul D Brown |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| South Africa | 1 | 8% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 8% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Researcher | 5 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 60 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 64 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,648,581
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,260
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,244
of 491,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 491,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.