| Title |
Aquatic exercise training for fibromyalgia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011336 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julia Bidonde, Angela J Busch, Sandra C Webber, Candice L Schachter, Adrienne Danyliw, Tom J Overend, Rachel S Richards, Tamara Rader |
| Abstract |
Exercise training is commonly recommended for individuals with fibromyalgia. This review examined the effects of supervised group aquatic training programs (led by an instructor). We defined aquatic training as exercising in a pool while standing at waist, chest, or shoulder depth. This review is part of the update of the 'Exercise for treating fibromyalgia syndrome' review first published in 2002, and previously updated in 2007. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 15 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 9% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Colombia | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Romania | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 46 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 9% |
| Scientists | 5 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,015 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1003 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 162 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 154 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 84 | 8% |
| Researcher | 59 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 58 | 6% |
| Other | 182 | 18% |
| Unknown | 316 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 263 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 162 | 16% |
| Sports and Recreations | 65 | 6% |
| Psychology | 44 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 26 | 3% |
| Other | 104 | 10% |
| Unknown | 351 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2022.
All research outputs
#517,498
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#905
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,361
of 274,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.