| Title |
Assistive technology for children and young people with low vision
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011350.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel Thomas, Lucy Barker, Gary Rubin, Annegret Dahlmann‐Noor |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 425 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 423 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 64 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 12% |
| Researcher | 51 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 11% |
| Other | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 74 | 17% |
| Unknown | 112 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 87 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 72 | 17% |
| Psychology | 36 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 54 | 13% |
| Unknown | 136 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,815,258
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,323
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,989
of 278,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#149
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.