↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for necrotising pancreatitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for necrotising pancreatitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011383.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Ajay P Belgaumkar, Adam Haswell, Stephen P Pereira, Brian R Davidson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 261 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 15%
Researcher 26 10%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 9%
Student > Postgraduate 21 8%
Other 48 18%
Unknown 77 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 112 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 10%
Psychology 7 3%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 84 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,888,178
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,024
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,906
of 297,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#105
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.