| Title |
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011391.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deniece Riviere, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, David A Kooby, Charles M Vollmer, Marc GH Besselink, Brian R Davidson, Cornelis JHM van Laarhoven |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 223 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 13% |
| Other | 23 | 10% |
| Researcher | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 16% |
| Unknown | 64 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 6% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 73 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2017.
All research outputs
#8,577,479
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,601
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,861
of 318,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#209
of 270 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 270 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.