| Title |
High‐dose chemotherapy followed by autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation for children, adolescents, and young adults with primary metastatic Ewing sarcoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011405.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lianne M Haveman, Roelof van Ewijk, Elvira C van Dalen, Willemijn B Breunis, Leontien Cm Kremer, Henk van den Berg, Uta Dirksen, Johannes Hm Merks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 30 | 35% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 2% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 1% |
| Professor | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 37 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 30 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 40 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,266,017
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,484
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,122
of 435,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#115
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.