| Title |
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta‐analysis of individual participant data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011412.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah J Nevitt, Maria Sudell, Sofia Cividini, Anthony G Marson, Catrin Tudur Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 17% |
| Spain | 7 | 17% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 19 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 10% |
| Scientists | 4 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 238 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 11% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 8% |
| Researcher | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 15% |
| Unknown | 93 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 4% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 14% |
| Unknown | 99 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,054,565
of 25,861,751 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,017
of 13,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,703
of 451,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,861,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.